John West, representing Huth, pointed to the timeline of the shooting for the film Let’s Do it Again. ![]() The verdict in favor of Huth, who was awarded $500,000, is the only legal recourse - albeit in a civil case - Cosby has faced after his conviction for drugging and assaulting Andrea Constand was overturned last year by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.ĭuring a hotly contested hearing representing Cosby’s last chance to toss the verdict outside of an appeal, lawyers for Huth argued that the defense knew the correct timeline of the assault since the beginning of the case. In her complaint, she alleged that Cosby forced her to perform a sexual act on him at the Playboy Mansion after she and a friend met him at a park where he was filming Let’s Do it Again.Ĭosby has denied assaulting Huth or any of the other 50 women who have accused him of assaulting them. Huth’s case was the first and only suit accusing Cosby of sexual assault to reach trial. “Our entire defense, an alibi defense, went out the window when Huth realized - if you want to call it that - that the events didn’t occur in 1974 nor did they occur when she was 15.” Cosby was greatly prejudiced because of the late disclosure of the years the events allegedly occurred,” Bonjean said. ![]() If she had known, she said she could have potentially been able to present numerous witnesses identified in visitor records that were discovered after the jury was already selected to refute Huth’s account of events. Bill Cosby Accuser Judy Huth Moves for Judge to Decide Her Case Over Juryīonjean detailed how no discovery was conducted for the new time period.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |